Thursday, April 12, 2012

English- Arabic-Urdu-Hindi Language Translator- Medical-Delegation interpreter- Travel Guide

English- Arabic-Urdu-Hindi Language Translator- Medical-Delegation interpreter- Travel Guide


How to acquire knowledge of God?

Now the question arises of how to acquire knowledge of and belief in God, his attributes, his law and the Day of Judgment?

We have already referred to the countless manifestations of God around us and in our own selves, which bear witness to the fact that there is one and only one creator and Governor of this universe and it is he who controls and directs it. These manifestations reflect the divine attributes of the creator: his great wisdom, his all-embracing knowledge, his omnipotence, his mercy, his all-sustaining power-in short his attributes can be traced everywhere in his works, but man’s intellect and capacity for knowledge have argued that there are two gods, others have professed belief in a trinity, and still others have succumbed to polytheism. Some have worshipped nature and others divided the creator into the gods of rain, air, fire, live, death and so on.

Similarly, men have put forward many erroneous nations about life after death for instance, that man is reduced to dust after death and will not rise to life again, or that man is subject to a process of continuous regeneration in this world and is punished or rewarded in future cycles of life.
Even greater difficulty arises when we come to the question of a code of living. To formulate a complete and balanced code that conforms to God’s pleasure merely using human reason is an extremely difficult task. Even if a man is equipped with the highest faculties of reason and intellect and possesses matchless wisdom and experience, the chances of his formulating the correct views on existence are slight. And even if, after a lifetime of reflection, he does in fact succeed, he will still lack the confidence that he has really discovered the truth and adopted the tight path.

The fullest and fairest test of man’s wisdom, reason and knowledge might have been to have left him to his own resources without any external guidance, but this would have meant that only those with the determination and ability to find the path of truth would find salvation, God, therefore, spared his human creatures such a hard test. Through his grace and benevolence he raised for mankind men from among themselves to whom he imparted the true knowledge of his attributes, revealed to them his law and the right code of living, gave them the knowledge of the meaning and purpose of life and of life after death and thus showed them the way by which ma can achieve success and eternal bliss.

These chosen men are the messengers of God his prophets. God has communicated knowledge and wisdom to them by means of revelation and the book containing the divine communications are called the book of God, or the word of God. The test of man’s wisdom and intellect therefore lies in this does he recognize God’s messengers after observing their pure and pious lives and carefully studying their Nobel and flawless teachings? A man of wisdom and common sense would accept instructions given by the messengers of truth, if he denies the messengers of God and their teachings, his denial would signify that he was devoid of the capacity to discover truth and righteousness. He would fail his test. Such a man will never be able to discover the truth about God and his law and life after death.


Wednesday, April 11, 2012

The significance of life after death

A little reflection should help us to see that the question of life after death is not merely a philosophical question; it is deeply and intimately related to our everyday life, in fact our moral attitude depends entirely upon this question. If a person is of the view that the life of this word is the only life and that there is no life of any kind after that, he must develop a particular type of moral attitude , a radically different kind of attitude and approach is bound to result if he believes that this life is to be followed by another life where one will have to render account of all one’s acts in this world and, that one’s conduct in worldly life, let us try to understand this through simple example, a person undertakes journey from Lahore to Karachi on the assumption that he is traveling to his final destination, where he will be beyond the reach of the police that could haul him up for and offence , and the jurisdiction of the courts of justice that could bring him to book, another person undertakes the same journey knowing that it is only the first stage of a longer journey which will carry him beyond Karachi, to a land overseas which is ruled by the same sovereign as that of Pakistan, he also know that court of that sovereign has complete secret dossiers of his activities in Pakistan and that this record will be fully examined there in order to decide what position and treatment he deserves by virtue of his past performance , Now , is should be easy to realize how different the conduct of these two travelers of the same train will be. The former will prepare himself only for the journey up to Karachi, whereas the latter will keep in view also the requirements of the further stages of the long journey, the former will assume that all the gains that he can possibly make, or all the losses or harms that he might suffer, will be confined to the journey up to Karachi, and that will be the end of it, the latter, on the other hand, will know that the real gains or losses of the journey will be realized in its last stages and not in the first, the former will keep in wives only those results of his actions as are likely to manifest themselves up to the time that he reaches Karachi; the latter’s visit will extend to the long term results likely to unfold themselves in the distant overseas lands where his journey will eventually take him.

Syed Affan
Mob: 91-9911024715
syed_quadrin@yahoo.co.in
Skype: syed.affan.quadri
Gtalk: syedaffanquadri@gmail.com
http://english-arabitranslation.blogspot.com

English- Arabic-Urdu-Hindi Language Translator- Medical-Delegation interpreter- Travel Guide

English- Arabic-Urdu-Hindi Language Translator- Medical-Delegation interpreter- Travel Guide


Life after death

Is there any life after death; if so, what kind of life is it? This question lies far beyond the ken of our perception. We do not have the eyes with which we could see beyond the frontiers of worldly life and find out what lies on beyond it. We do not have the ears with which we could hear anything from beyond these frontiers. Nor do we have any instrument by which we could determine with certainty whether there is any life beyond death. Therefore, the question whether there is any life after death lies completely outside the province of scientific knowledge which is concerned with the classification and interpretation of sense data. Anyone who asserts in the name of science that there is no life after death therefore makes a very unscientific statement. Merely on the basis of scientific knowledge , we can neither affirm that there is a life after death nor deny it, until we discover a dependable means of acquiring knowledge about this matter, the correct scientific attitude would be neither to affirm nor to deny the possibility of life after death . The question is beyond its jurisdiction.
But can we possibly maintain this attitude in life? Can we afford to adhere to this neutrality? Theoretically speaking, this may hold well, but looking to the hard realities of life which we have to face on every turn and pass, our answer would be: certainly not. If we do not have the means to know a thing directly, it is of course possible for us, from a purely rational point of view, to refrain from either affirming or dyeing it. But if the thing is directly concerned with our everyday life, we cannot maintain that attitude and must either affirm or deny its existence; in order to live a full life on the earth we must have a definite attitude towards such problems. These questions simply cannot be avoided. For instance, if you do not know a person with whom you do not have any dealings, you may refrain from forming an opinion about his integrity and trustworthiness; but if you have to deal with him, you must do so either on the assumption that he is an honest man or on the supposition that he is not. You may also proceed with the idea that until his honesty is either proved or disproved in practice, you will deal with him on the assumption that his integrity is doubtful. But this manner of dealing with him would, in effect, be no different from the way you would deal with him if you were convinced of his dishonesty, therefore, a state of doubt between affirmation and denial is possible only as an abstract idea; it cannot form the basis of practical dealings, which require a positive attitude of either affirmation or denial.